This Fruity Fragrance Is the Most Underrated Tom Ford Perfume—and It’s Perfect for Summer
The verdict · portfolio vs. page
The Hearst portfolio is cited on 67% of these queries. This page wins 53%.
+14 pts vs this-URL on the same queries — the portfolio wins the topic this single page does not (Elle, Harper's Bazaar win it with other pages).
The article is cited in 53 percent of query sets where it appears, against a 67 percent rate for any publisher being cited across those same queries, leaving a 14-point gap that reflects moderate but not dominant retrieval. ChatGPT is the clear driver of performance, citing this URL in half its sessions at an average position of about 2.1 and embedding it in prose every time it appears, while Google AI Overviews never surfaces the article at all and Perplexity cites it in only 20 percent of its sessions at a much lower average position of 5.6. When competing sources appear instead, Reddit and YouTube are tied as the most frequent alternatives, each present in 86 percent of competing sessions, followed by Fragrantica and Macys.com at 57 percent, suggesting that community forums and retail destinations absorb significant share that editorial content does not capture. The article's overall competitive share of 46 percent confirms it holds less than half the available citation opportunities even in sessions where it does appear.
Recommended
What to do next
Close the Google AI Overviews blackout
Google AI Overviews cites Hearst on 0% of these queries while ChatGPT (58%) and Perplexity (40%) do — that points to an eligibility or indexing gap, not a content problem.
Audit how this page is eligible for Google AI Overviews (indexing, structured data, freshness) before changing the article.
Win back the commerce and community slot
When this review is not cited, the slot most often goes to reddit.com (86%), youtube.com (86%), fragrantica.com (57%) — the brand's own pages, retail and user forums, not rival publishers.
Lead with the first-person testing, product specs and FAQ structure those sources win on, so the review competes for the same answers.
Competitive share
46%
Hearst vs all cited sources
Cited influence
7%
share of claims tracing to Hearst · directional
Per engine
How each assistant treats this page
No Hearst citation on any of these queries.
Cites youtube.com x9, reddit.com x8, venbafragrance.com x7 instead.
This-URL 0% · Any-Hearst 0% · Competitive share 0% · AI influence 0%
Citation rate by engine
Other Hearst URLs involved
Where the topic is won
Query coverage
By specificity
By intent
By specificity
By intent
By specificity
By intent
The real competition